Which of the following actions may be considered discriminatory in housing practices?

Advertising exclusive access can be considered discriminatory in housing practices because it can imply that certain groups are being excluded from opportunities for housing based on protected characteristics, such as race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, or disability. This type of advertisement may create a perception that specific groups are not welcomed or are intentionally being left out, which runs counter to fair housing laws designed to ensure equal opportunity in housing access.

In contrast, requiring a security deposit, vetting applicants carefully, and conducting background checks are generally standard practices in the housing industry. These actions are typically viewed as necessary steps for ensuring tenant reliability and property safety, provided they are applied uniformly to all applicants without bias. Discrimination becomes a concern primarily when actions or practices are selectively enforced or communicated in a way that suggests preference or exclusion based on a protected characteristic.