Which advertising scenario complies with Article 12 of the NAR Code of Ethics?

The scenario where an agent removes a property's advertisement after the owner decides to wait a year to sell complies with Article 12 of the NAR Code of Ethics. This article emphasizes the importance of honesty and transparency in advertising and requires agents to ensure that their advertisements are accurate and truthful, reflecting the current status of a property.

By promptly removing the advertisement at the owner’s request, the agent demonstrates respect for the owner's decision and maintains the integrity of the advertising process. This action shows that the agent is responsive to the client’s needs and prioritizes their interests, which is a core tenet of ethical practice in real estate.

The other scenarios present issues related to compliance with the NAR Code of Ethics. For instance, consistently advertising properties without the owner's consent raises ethical concerns about proper representation and permission, while using personal social media for all marketing may not align with professional standards or brand image. Promoting sold properties can also be misleading unless clearly indicated, as it can create false expectations for potential buyers. Thus, option B stands out as the only scenario that aligns with the ethical obligations set forth in the NAR Code of Ethics.